China is putting on a series of "Eight Allied forces"

In Europe and the United States anti-dumping, so Chinese cheap IT products to enter the European market, would have been the patent stick in your face; Chinese not anti monopoly law, so that foreign IT giants with the name of the patent monopoly, actually can do whatever they want. From the beginning of 2003, with China's accession to the WTO, Chinese and foreign patent disputes will come one after another, step by step upgrade. Just enter 2005, because the patent war frequently caused by burning into the country within, can not let people think of a century ago, Britain, France and Germany, Austria, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States eight rely on their military power, in the Chinese territory cruelly burning prostitution sweep, frantically to carve up the territory. The introduction of Chinese people for half a century of the abyss of disaster. Now, the giants waving the patent stick, pushy Chinese IT enterprises, there is a "patent eight" farce.

Japanese companies to levy royalties in the Chinese digital camera, the lion big mouth; led by PHILPS 4C DVD enterprise Chinese force on the wall, also claimed to have had nothing to do with; Intel sued a little-known Chinese IT enterprise, an opening to ask for compensation for $7 million 960 thousand (65 million 780 thousand yuan); and the news today Italy, a company called SISVEL to China enterprise levy MP3 patent fee, also care about Germany and seized China export products...... So, dizzying.

Is there any truth in this world? Is there a fair competition in the world's IT market?

Yes, the law of the market economy is the case, who owns the patent, who will have the control of the market; who use the patent, who will pay royalties. However, foreign companies invariably patent to suppress Chinese enterprises, just to collect royalties?

The answer was No. From the beginning of 2003, CISCO sued HUAWEI infringement, to early 2004 Intel by American government and Industry Association forces sniper round wireless LAN WAPI national standard, to the beginning of 2005 a patent dispute, telling Chinese a fact: the foreign IT companies to monopolize the market, China blocking Chinese enterprises enter the international market, must stick to patent barriers, step by step.

With the development of domestic and international two market competition intensified, with the overall competitiveness of Chinese IT industry continues to improve, with the China IT product market share continues to grow, the next few years, foreign enterprise IT patent stick will hold more firmly, the China IT enterprises will be more powerful blow. This is not a part of the will of the people as the inevitable trend of transfer.

Fact speaks louder than words. With the development of China's economy in recent years, the international "China Threat Theory" has not been interrupted. In the United States part of the Hawks rendering China's new military threat, while the Wall Street journal, fortune, business week, and other mainstream media in the United States is also speculation, China's high-tech threat theory".

In such a big background, calm analysis of Intel, CISCO, PHILPS and Japan, Italy and other countries in the patent on the big fuss of the enterprise, can find a clear answer. From the invasion of a century ago Brittan, today the world patent powers campaign, played with a darn logic: never allow Chinese strong, China only in a weak person is always oppressed bullying status.

In Chinese, professionals to dilute the political, enterprises focus on the market, but have no ground for blame, don't forget, every enterprise has their own "politics": without harming national interests, the interests of more in other countries and regions as possible, from the countries and regions of the consumers earn more money.

There is no love for no reason, no reason to hate, this sentence is always the truth. Take this idea to see Intel, PHILPS and other foreign companies in the patent on the performance of enterprises and their China IT kind of "love" and "hate" (cooperation) (control), and what does not want to understand?