Five strokes were accused of plagiarism inventor Wang Yongmin said the other to speculation

Wang Yongmin said that the other side of the lawsuit hype, has lost several times.

Wang Yongmin, the inventor of the five font, was accused of plagiarism". Plaintiff Jiang Tao said he is impressed by Wang Yongmin's fame, was forced to sue. Wang Yongmin responded by saying: This is a speculation." Yesterday, the Haidian District court accepted the case.

Yesterday, in an interview with Jiang Tao, he found the five strokes etymons back up is very difficult, but through their own arrangement method can completely avoid the recitation. In March 2000, he edited the "Five - way fool learning method" published. In May 2004, Jiang Tao discovered in June 2001 by the compilation of the "typing expert - five font fast entry secret". Jiang Tao said, after identification, the book Chinese characters in sequence, expression, identification code word code expression stole his works. Jiang Tao said, because Wang Yongmin is the inventor of the five font, and he is just an ordinary person. Readers have now begun to suspect that they are plagiarism. In the absence of circumstances, Jiang Tao decided to prosecute.

Wang Yongmin learned that the case has been accepted, Jiang Tao said this is just speculation: "I invented and popularized five strokes, write 800 words in textbooks and codebook, these works become" by five strokes. "The writings copied according to use sources, Jiang Tao is no exception." Wang Yongmin said that this is not the first prosecution of Jiang Tao. "He's been suing everywhere, losing more than winning. He said he used his stuff in my book. When he and his lawyer came to the company, to see the evidence I produced, he took the initiative to withdraw. Not long ago, Jiang Tao lost the lawsuit, he asked me to 'solidarity', wrote a fierce article, I signed the people's daily and Guangming daily. I pushed back. Jiang Taohuo, the court indicted again."

Wang Yongmin believes that Jiang Tao's "speculation" and accused him of plagiarism has violated the criminal law, he has evidence that this is the "blame", "the fact is that he has violated our copyright! I'm not going to say anything. I believe the court."