LED street lights at this stage in the end is not energy-efficient?

It's common sense to talk about a problem and stand up for your own opinion. Now there are a lot of debate on LED lighting, you can take the participants to describe the hot. Before the debate, I think we all know who wins! The reason is very simple future is LED no suspense, just a matter of time. Hinder the process of time is nothing more than two aspects, one is light effect; the two is cost-effective.

When we see a movie, the conflict between justice and evil, bandits and public security on the dry, the outcome will be very clear, and now you just enjoy the process. Only the best of the "LED lighting debate" metaphor. I think it's a good idea to pay for the LED lighting project. The country's investment should be based on the application of LED, the development of the entire LED industry is beneficial to. Usually LED lighting design lamps halved in the traditional energy-saving lamps.

For example: 40W daylight tube LED design generally use less than 20W power 250W street lamp LED street lamp is usually designed to 100W power. This is the reason why the LED lighting energy saving, if we will directly reduce the traditional lighting power, electricity is the same effect. Why half power design, the main reason for the cost problem, the cost can be divided into direct price and heat input costs.

At the present stage, the design cost of LED lighting lamp is 10 times that of the traditional energy-saving lamps, and the design of power halving is the most effective way to reduce the cost. With the increase of the centralized power, the design of LED lamps will increase with the index, and even the design can not be completed. Imagine street lighting will be the focus of the design of the 250W cost and cooling conditions? LED lighting has the directivity theory". The reason for this is that LED has a high degree of light directivity, and the light is fully utilized in the front. For me personally, I do not oppose this doctrine, nor do I agree with this view, I hope we all look at the issue from a pragmatic perspective.

LED street lights at this stage in the end is not energy-efficient?

In the design of the product needs to be around and behind the light, reflected in the rational use of the front, to achieve the desired effect of the spotlight, the traditional lighting has been such an application. LED can not withstand a higher junction temperature, the need for adequate cross-sectional area conduction heat, otherwise it can be connected to the line segment packaging 360 degrees out of LED. The directivity of LED is actually the result of the optical structure of the packaging bracket. "The theory of directivity" is the first stage to explain the theory of LED energy saving.

That we are not enough to criticize the home lighting or praise the government pragmatic savings? Or that the economic strength of Shenzhen do not care, or criticized Shenzhen too wasteful? At 3 in the morning, from Shenzhen, Luohu to Shekou, all the way to see the street lights are not said to cut half of the time, did not see the street lights are partially closed. It's very difficult to enjoy the moonlight at night in the streets of Shenzhen.

When we were young, we used kerosene lamps to learn, and we did not feel invisible It is said that the father of the blue, "village repair two" to the "Sichuan University" speech can only vaguely see the blue light appeared, when the students are very excited, and now if you encounter what he would like to see? Is the most basic for the design of products in line with national standards, but requires public recognition, time still need to be confirmed, a few views for reference only, the conclusion can not be simple. I still say that the principle of energy saving, do not agree, do not oppose".